Governed knowledge engine

Inference is replaceable.
Governance is not.

Upload your documents. Ask questions in plain English. Get cited, grounded answers from your own content, with confidence scoring, refusal enforcement, a full audit trail and multi-tenant support.

Answers you can defend.

Kaaryaa Intelligence
The Problem

Governed answers for regulated work

Organisations sit on thousands of policies, circulars and manuals that staff struggle to search. RAGGR is designed to give cited answers from your own documents, with role-based access, an approval workflow and an audit trail.

Stage 01 🤖
General-purpose AI assistants

Answers from general knowledge rather than from your own documents.

Not tied to your approved documents
Stage 02 🔍
Build-your-own RAG

Grounded in documents; governance is built separately.

Assembled from components you choose
Stage 03 🛡️
RAGGR — RAG with GuardRails

A governance layer for compliance-first organisations, designed into the engine instead of added afterwards.

RBAC pre-filter · maker-checker
Full audit trail · PII detection
Cited answers
Platform Features

Six governance layers, by design

Each layer sits inside the engine, not bolted on as an afterthought plugin.

🔐
RBAC Pre-Filter

Role-based filtering is designed to apply before retrieval.

→ section_level_acl
✅
Maker-Checker Workflow

No document goes live unreviewed. Four-stage approval: draft, review, approve, publish, with full status tracking.

→ maker_checker_pipeline
📋
Full Audit Trail

Every query is logged: user, document pool, model used, answer, confidence score and timestamp. Exportable for review.

→ kairo_logs table
🛡️
PII Detection

Aadhaar, PAN, Passport, IFSC, UPI and Voter ID flagged at ingestion and before delivery, using a PII-detection engine with India-specific recognisers.

→ PII detector module
📎
Citation Enforcement

Answers are designed to cite their source page.

→ citation_enforcer
🏢
Multi-Tenant Support

One engine, many organisations. Separate knowledge pools per organisation, with per-tenant API keys, model overrides and usage dashboards.

→ Per-tenant configuration
Model Benchmark

Model choice, measured on an internal question set

Internal evaluation set: 130 questions across MCQ, fill-blank, keyword and open-ended formats, run on a technical-course corpus. RaggrKairo routes by query type, not by preference.

MetricCloud modelOpen 70B model
Citation Rate82%96%
Faithfulness94%96%
Avg Latency3.8s1.2s

On this internal set the open-weight model had a higher citation rate and faithfulness and lower latency. Internal evaluation on one corpus, not an independent audit; results vary with your documents.

Faithfulness96%
Citation Rate (open-weight)96%
Deployment options

Three ways to deploy

From shared SaaS for a proof of concept to on-premise deployment for data-residency needs.

Shared SaaS
Start small
  • Up to 3 document pools
  • Shared RAGGR infrastructure
  • Full guardrail stack included
  • RaggrKairo model routing
  • Standard audit logging
  • Guided onboarding
Start a pilot →
On-Premise
Your infrastructure · Local model on-prem
  • Deploy inside your Azure VNet
  • Local inference option
  • Designed to keep data in your environment
  • Full white-label option
  • Custom PII recogniser library
  • Deployment documentation
Contact us →
Ready to talk

Your documents deserve
a governed answer engine

Tell us about your documents and who needs to ask questions of them. We will set up a pilot around that.

6
Governance layers in the engine
130
Questions in internal evaluation set
96%
Faithfulness (internal evaluation set)
3
Deployment options

Figures come from our internal evaluation, not an independent audit.